[Preprint] PRISM: ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific genomic annotations enhances the transferability of polygenic scores.

Preprint posted on bioRxiv, 2025

In this study, led by Xiaohe (Lucy) Tian, we showed that ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific genomic annotations enhances the transferability of polygenic scores (PGS).

Abstract

The limited transferability of polygenic scores (PGS) across populations constrains their clinical utility and risks exacerbating health disparities, given challenges in multi-ancestry training, fine-mapping, and variant prioritization using genomic annotations, particularly when biologically relevant reference resources are sparse or unavailable for the target population. Here, we introduce PRISM, a transfer learning approach that jointly addresses these challenges to enhance PGS transferability. Applying PRISM to 7352 fine-mapped variants, 414 ENCODE annotations, and 406,659 individuals from the UK Biobank, we demonstrate that ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific annotations yields the largest gains in predictive performance for African ancestry, with an average improvement of 13.10% (p=1.6×10−5) over annotation-agnostic multi-ancestry PGS. Notably, the best-performing model uses 102-fold fewer annotations than non-specific models, with contributions from broad categories of annotations. Overall, PRISM complements ongoing data diversification efforts by providing an immediately applicable strategy based on the integration of biologically aligned, best-available resources to address genomic health equity.

PRISM: ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific genomic annotations enhances the transferability of polygenic scores

Highlights

Accurate genetic prediction of complex traits has the potential to substantially reduce the disease burden, but the limited transferability of polygenic score (PGS) across genetic ancestry groups remains a major challenge.

Polygenic score (PGS) aggregates the genetic effects across many variants into one score

Here we propose to integrate three major approaches to address the PGS transferability. We develop PRISM and apply it to 7352 fine-mapped variants from MVP, 414 ENCODE annotations, and 406,659 individuals from the UK Biobank.

PRISM integrates 3 major approaches to address PGS transferability

Using PRISM, we evaluated the effects of ancestry and tissue-specific integration of genomic annotations. We also compared our approach with existing methods and investigated which genomic annotation would be the most informative.

Ancestry- and tissue-specific PRISM models

We found that tissue-matched genomic annotations (from ENCODE) are most effective for enhancing PGS transferability, even though the tissue-agnostic strategy can leverage a ~18-fold larger number of genomic annotation datasets.

Tissue-matched training improves PGS transferability

Similarly, the use of genetic ancestry-specific fine-mapped variants is most effective, despite the power difference. Our approach offers a pragmatic solution for working with data with uneven coverage across contexts.

Biological alignment outweighs >100-fold differences in annotation data

Our benchmarking analysis shows PRISM benefits from three different strategies for enhancing PGS transferability.

PRISM demonstrates outperforming and competitive predictive performance

We showed, through feature importance analysis, that having one reference genomic annotation is not sufficient, highlighting the advantage in systematic integration with our approach.

No single feature alone is sufficient to enhance PGS predictive performance in PRISM

We confirm that the genetic variants selected from our approach are supported by various genomic annotations compared to other variants in LD.

PRISM enables biological interpretation of selected variants

I am grateful for the Lucy and the team for making this work possible.

PRISM: transfer-learning for integrating biological knowledge in PGS

Reference: PRISM: ancestry-aware integration of tissue-specific genomic annotations enhances the transferability of polygenic scores, X. Tian, T. Fabiha, W. F. Li, K. K. Dey, M. Kellis, Y. Tanigawa. bioRxiv, 2025.11.13.688144 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.13.688144